🇧🇷 🇺🇸 🇪🇸
🌐 🇧🇷 PT 🇪🇸 ES 🇺🇸 EN
Acts 15

The Council of Jerusalem — The Great Decision

The debate about circumcision, the speeches of Peter and James, and the apostolic letter to the Gentiles

⚖️ The Theological Conflict (15:1-5)

Acts 15:1-2
"But some men came down from Judea and were teaching the brothers, 'Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.' And after Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and debate with them, Paul and Barnabas and some of the others were appointed to go up to Jerusalem to the apostles and the elders about this question."
The Council of Jerusalem (c. AD 49) is the first council of the Christian Church—and the model for all that followed. The issue under debate is the most fundamental possible: what is necessary for salvation? The Judaizers (Jewish Christians from Jerusalem) insisted that circumcision was necessary for salvation—the faith in Jesus was not enough. Paul and Barnabas resist vigorously: this would be a 'different gospel' (Gal 1:6-9), a denial of the sufficiency of grace. The solution is to reconcile: take the matter to the apostolic leadership in Jerusalem. This is the model for resolving doctrinal conflicts: dialogue, consultation with leadership, collective decision.

🗣️ The Speeches and the Decision (15:6-29)

Acts 15:7-11
"And after there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, 'Brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. And God, who knows the heart, bore witness to them, by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us; and he made no distinction between us and them, having cleansed their hearts by faith. Now, therefore, why are you putting God to the test by placing a yoke on the neck of the disciples that neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will.'"
Peter's speech is decisive: he appeals to his own experience with Cornelius (chapters 10-11) as evidence that God makes no distinction between Jews and Gentiles. The argument is ironic and powerful: if the Law could not save even the Jews themselves ('neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear'), why impose it on the Gentiles? The final phrase is the essence of the Gospel: 'we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus'—not by the Law, not by circumcision, not by works. This is the central thesis of Romans and Galatians in one sentence.
Acts 15:13-21
"After they finished speaking, James replied, 'Brothers, listen to me. Simeon has related how God first visited the Gentiles, to take from them a people for his name. And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written, "After this I will return, and I will rebuild the tent of David that has fallen..."'
James, the brother of Jesus and leader of the Jerusalem Church, gives the final word. He confirms Peter’s testimony with Scripture—Amos 9:11-12—showing that the inclusion of the Gentiles was foretold by the prophets. James’s decision is wise and pastoral: not to impose circumcision on the Gentiles, but to ask them to abstain from four things that would offend the Jews: idols, sexual immorality, strangled meat, and blood. This is not salvation by works—it is pastoral consideration for coexistence between Jews and Gentiles in the same community. The Council of Jerusalem is a triumph of grace and ecclesial unity.
Acts 15:28-29
"For it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay on you no greater burden than these requirements: that you abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from what has been strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well. Farewell."
The formula 'it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us' (edoxen gar to pneumati to hagio kai hemin) is unique in the NT—and deeply significant. The conciliar decision is not merely human (consensus of leaders) nor merely divine (direct revelation)—it is the confluence of both. The Holy Spirit guides the Church through the process of human deliberation: prayer, debate, Scripture, testimony of experience, consensus. This is the model of ecclesiastical discernment the Church has followed for two millennia.